TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether non-furnishing of the written grounds of arrest in terms of Section 19 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 vitiated the arrest and supported grant of bail; (ii) Whether, on the material collected, the twin conditions under Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 were satisfied and the allegations disclosed a prima facie case of money-laundering.
Issue (i): Whether non-furnishing of the written grounds of arrest in terms of Section 19 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 vitiated the arrest and supported grant of bail.
Analysis: Section 19 requires recording of reasons to believe in writing and informing the arrested person of the grounds of arrest. The Court applied the principle that mere reading over of the grounds is not enough and relied on the binding effect of the requirement that a written copy of the grounds be furnished to the arrested person. On that basis, non-compliance with the statutory safeguard was treated as a serious infirmity affecting the arrest.
Conclusion: The arrest was held to be vitiated for want of compliance with Section 19, which favoured the petitioner.
Issue (ii): Whether, on the material collected, the twin conditions under Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 were satisfied and the allegations disclosed a prima facie case of money-laundering.
Analysis: The Court held that, at the bail stage, only a prima facie assessment is required. The materials were found insufficient to show that the petitioner had participated in forgery, manipulation of title deeds, or generation and laundering of proceeds of crime. The Court distinguished suspicion from reason to believe, noted the absence of material linking the petitioner to the scheduled offence or to any proceeds of crime, and held that the allegations did not satisfy the essential ingredients of money-laundering. It further considered the custody period, the stage of trial, and the absence of criminal antecedents while assessing the likelihood of reoffending.
Conclusion: The twin conditions under Section 45 were held to be satisfied in favour of the petitioner, and bail was granted.
Final Conclusion: The application for bail was allowed, with release ordered on conditions, because the arrest suffered from statutory non-compliance and the available material did not disclose a sufficient prima facie case of money-laundering against the petitioner.
Ratio Decidendi: Under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, written furnishing of the grounds of arrest is a mandatory safeguard, and at the bail stage the court must assess only whether the available material discloses a prima facie case and reasonable grounds for believing that the accused is not guilty and will not reoffend.
TaxTMI 
