Cooperative housing society entitled to section 80P(2) deduction on interest income from cooperative banks

ITAT Mumbai held that a cooperative housing society was entitled to deduction under section 80P(2) on interest income received from cooperative banks. The tribunal ruled that section 80P(4), which denies deduction to cooperative banks, does not apply to the assessee as it is a housing society and not a cooperative bank. The decision was supported by SC precedent in Kerala State Co-Operative Agricultural Rural Development Bank Ltd case. The tribunal reversed CIT(A)'s order and directed AO to allow the deduction.

---

---

Issues Involved:
The judgment involves the following issues:
1. Allowance of deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) for interest earned from Co-operative Banks.
2. Interpretation of deduction under section 80P(2)(d) as opposed to section 80P(4).
3. Consideration of written submissions and past decisions regarding similar deductions.
4. Condonation of delay in filing the appeal.

Issue 1: Allowance of Deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) for Interest Earned from Co-operative Banks:
The appeal was filed by the Navrang Basant Co-operative Housing Society Limited against the appellate order dismissing their appeal regarding the denial of deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) for interest earned from Co-operative Banks. The Assessing Officer rejected the claim for deduction under section 80P(2)(d) on the grounds that interest received from cooperative banks was not eligible for deduction under section 80P as they are not cooperative societies. The Tribunal, after considering the facts, held that the assessee, being a cooperative housing society and not a cooperative bank, was eligible for deduction u/s 80P(2) of the Act. The Tribunal reversed the order of the CIT (A) and allowed the deduction on interest income, citing relevant Supreme Court judgments to support its decision.

Issue 2: Interpretation of Deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) as Opposed to Section 80P(4):
The Assessing Officer contended that deduction under section 80P(2)(d) was not allowable as per sub-section 4 of section 80P of the Act. The Tribunal clarified that section 80P(4) denies deduction to cooperative banks only, not to cooperative housing societies like the appellant. By differentiating between the nature of the appellant's entity and a cooperative bank, the Tribunal upheld the eligibility of the appellant for deduction under section 80P(2)(d).

Issue 3: Consideration of Written Submissions and Past Decisions:
The appellant argued that the CIT (A) erred in not considering the written submissions filed, the decision of the CIT(A) for A.Y. 2015-16 in the appellant's own case, and decisions of the jurisdictional Tribunal where deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) was allowed for interest income earned from Co-operative Banks. The Tribunal reviewed these arguments and found merit in the appellant's contentions, ultimately allowing the deduction based on the appellant's status as a cooperative housing society.

Issue 4: Condonation of Delay in Filing the Appeal:
The appeal of the appellant was filed late, leading to a delay of 82 days. The appellant attributed the delay to not receiving the order of the CIT (A) in time. The Tribunal, following the principle that a pedantic approach should not be taken in condoning delays, accepted the appellant's explanation and condoned the delay. Despite objections from the Departmental Representative, the Tribunal allowed the appeal on its merits after considering the delay issue.

This judgment by the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai highlights the importance of correctly interpreting the provisions of the Income-tax Act, particularly regarding deductions for entities like cooperative housing societies. The Tribunal's decision to allow the deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) for interest income earned from Co-operative Banks in the case of the appellant sets a precedent based on the entity's nature and eligibility criteria specified in the relevant sections of the Act.

---