Ceiling authorities may test the genuineness of alleged tenancies to stop evasion of agricultural land ceiling law.

A ceiling authority may examine whether an alleged tenancy or transfer is genuine and bona fide when that inquiry is necessary to prevent evasion of ceiling law. The tenancy statute's allocation of tenancy questions to the Tenancy Tahsildar does not exclude the ceiling authority from scrutinising transfers relied on to reduce holdings, because the ceiling inquiry concerns whether the transaction was created in anticipation of defeating the ceiling regime. The statutory schemes are to be read harmoniously, and the ceiling authority's power extends to rejecting sham or non-bona fide arrangements used to circumvent agricultural land ceiling limits.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Ceiling Authorities could examine the genuineness of the alleged tenancies and treat the transfers as not bona fide notwithstanding the jurisdiction conferred on the Tenancy Tahsildar under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958.

Analysis: The statutory scheme of the ceiling law and the tenancy law was read harmoniously. While Section 100 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958 deals with questions of tenancy and Section 124 bars civil court scrutiny of matters required to be decided under that Act, the ceiling proceedings involved a different inquiry, namely whether the transfers relied upon by the holder were genuine or were made in anticipation of defeating the ceiling law. Having regard to the object of the Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 and its connection with the directive principles in Article 39(b) and (c), the Ceiling Authorities were entitled to determine whether the alleged tenancy was in fact bona fide.

Conclusion: The Ceiling Authorities had jurisdiction to examine the genuineness of the alleged tenancy, and the finding that the transfer was not bona fide and was made to defeat the ceiling law was upheld.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a ceiling statute must be implemented, the authority under that statute may determine whether an alleged transfer or tenancy is genuine and bona fide, even if tenancy questions are otherwise within the tenancy authority's domain, when that inquiry is necessary to prevent evasion of the ceiling law.

---