Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2016 (7) TMI 1690 - AT - SEBI

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal Overturns Misleading SEBI Letter, Orders Quick Reassignment and Rs. 1 Lakh Compensation for Mishandling. The Securities Appellate Tribunal quashed a misleading letter issued by SEBI's Chief General Manager, which falsely implied that an order was passed by ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                            Tribunal Overturns Misleading SEBI Letter, Orders Quick Reassignment and Rs. 1 Lakh Compensation for Mishandling.

                            The Securities Appellate Tribunal quashed a misleading letter issued by SEBI's Chief General Manager, which falsely implied that an order was passed by the Whole Time Member (WTM). The Tribunal condemned the WTM's failure to pass an order within the stipulated time and the misleading conduct. It directed SEBI to reassign the matter to a different WTM, who must issue an order within two weeks after a hearing. Additionally, SEBI was ordered to pay costs of Rs. 1 lakh to the appellant for the inconvenience caused by the mishandling of the case.




                            Issues:
                            1. Failure to pass an order by the Whole Time Member (WTM) of Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) within the stipulated time.
                            2. Issuance of a letter by the Chief General Manager of SEBI, misrepresenting that an order was passed by the WTM when it was not.
                            3. Lack of responsibility and misleading conduct by the WTM of SEBI in handling the appellant's representation.
                            4. Direction by the Securities Appellate Tribunal to quash the letter, assign the matter to another WTM of SEBI, and pass an order within two weeks.
                            5. Imposition of costs on SEBI for the appellant's inconvenience.

                            Issue 1: Failure to Pass an Order by the WTM of SEBI
                            The Tribunal noted that despite being required to pass an order by a specified date, the WTM of SEBI did not do so. The WTM failed to seek an extension of time and instead attempted to mislead by allowing a letter to be issued stating that the representation was disposed of when no actual order was passed. This conduct was strongly condemned as irresponsible and misleading.

                            Issue 2: Misrepresentation by the Chief General Manager of SEBI
                            The Tribunal found that the Chief General Manager issued a letter implying that the WTM had passed an order when, in reality, no such order existed. The letter was based on a note prepared by a junior officer and approved by the WTM, but it did not constitute a formal order. This misrepresentation led to confusion and necessitated the Tribunal's intervention to rectify the situation.

                            Issue 3: Lack of Responsibility and Misleading Conduct by the WTM of SEBI
                            The WTM of SEBI failed to fulfill the obligation to pass an order within the specified time frame and did not take necessary steps to seek an extension. By allowing the issuance of a letter implying an order was passed when it was not, the WTM engaged in misleading conduct. The Tribunal expressed strong disapproval of this behavior and emphasized the importance of upholding transparency and due process in such matters.

                            Issue 4: Direction by the Securities Appellate Tribunal
                            In response to the mishandling of the appellant's representation, the Tribunal quashed the misleading letter and directed SEBI to assign the matter to another responsible WTM. The new WTM was instructed to pass an order within two weeks after providing an opportunity for the appellant to be heard. The Tribunal highlighted the need for proper handling of representations and emphasized the importance of adhering to procedural requirements.

                            Issue 5: Imposition of Costs on SEBI
                            Due to the inconvenience caused to the appellant by the mishandling of the case, the Tribunal imposed costs amounting to Rs. 1 lac on SEBI. This decision aimed to address the appellant's unnecessary difficulties resulting from the WTM's actions and underscored the Tribunal's commitment to ensuring accountability and fair treatment in such proceedings.

                            This detailed analysis of the judgment highlights the issues involved, the Tribunal's findings, and the corrective actions taken to address the mishandling of the appellant's representation by the WTM of SEBI and the Chief General Manager.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found