Tax Assessment Order Overturned; Awaiting DRP Directions for New Evaluation Under Income-Tax Act Provisions.

The HC set aside the Assessment Order dated 15.05.2021 under Section 143 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, due to pending objections before the DRP as per Section 144C(13). The court directed that the first respondent must await the DRP's directions before proceeding. The assessment is to be conducted de novo based on its merits and in accordance with the law once the DRP issues its directions. The court made no comment on the merits of the case, and the writ petition was disposed of, with connected petitions closed without costs.

---

---

Issues:
Challenge to Assessment Order under Section 143 of the Income-tax Act, 1961; Compliance with Section 144C(13) regarding objections before the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP); Extension of limitation period due to Covid-19 situation.

Analysis:
The judgment concerns a writ petition challenging an Assessment Order dated 15.05.2021 issued under Section 143 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The main issue revolves around the petitioner's approach to the third respondent, the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP), as per Section 144C(13) of the Act. The petitioner's objections before the DRP are pending, and the directions of the DRP under Section 144C(5) need to be awaited. The Revenue counsel acknowledged the extended period of limitation due to the Covid-19 situation and confirmed that the petitioner has indeed approached the DRP. Consequently, the first respondent is required to await directions from the DRP since the petitioner's objections are still pending before the panel.

The court set aside the impugned Assessment Order solely on the ground that the objections before the DRP are pending, and the directions of the DRP under Section 144C(5) must be awaited as per Section 144C(13). It was explicitly stated that the court expressed no opinion on the merits of the matter. Upon the DRP issuing directions, the first respondent is directed to proceed with the assessment de novo based on its own merits and in accordance with the law, completing the exercise as expeditiously as possible. The court emphasized that this process should not be influenced by any observations on merits made in the order. The writ petition was disposed of with the provided directives, and the connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions were closed without any order as to costs.

---