TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal dismissed: Court upholds interpretation of Rule 11(3) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and Notification No. 30/2004.</h1> The HC dismissed the appeal, upholding the interpretation of Rule 11(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and Notification No. 30/2004. The court's ... Interpretation of Rule 11(3) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 - interface with Notification No. 30/2004 dated 09.07.2004 - HELD THAT:- Recently, a Division Bench of this Court in the case of UNION OF INDIA VERSUS KANCHAN INDIA LIMITED. [2019 (7) TMI 1583 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] had interpreted Rule 11(3) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 and thereafter interface with Notification No. 30/2004 dated 09.07.2004 and held in favour of the assessee. Appeal dismissed. The Rajasthan High Court dismissed an appeal based on the interpretation of Rule 11(3) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 and Notification No. 30/2004. The decision was influenced by a previous case involving Union of India Vs. Kanchan India Limited.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
