VAT first charge ed to insolvency law, so tax authority was not a secured creditor.

Section 48 of the Gujarat VAT Act creates a first charge on a dealer's property for tax dues, but that charge does not prevail in insolvency because Section 238 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code gives the Code overriding effect over inconsistent laws. Applying its earlier larger-bench view and the distribution scheme in Section 53, the Tribunal stated that the Government cannot assert a first charge over a corporate debtor's property for insolvency purposes or claim secured creditor status under Sections 3(30) and 3(31). The State tax authority was therefore not entitled to be treated as a secured creditor, and the challenge failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the statutory first charge under Section 48 of the Gujarat VAT Act, 2003 entitled the State tax authority to be treated as a secured creditor in insolvency proceedings despite the overriding effect of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Analysis: Section 48 of the Gujarat VAT Act creates a first charge on the dealer's property for tax, interest, and penalty. However, Section 238 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 gives the Code overriding effect over inconsistent laws. The Tribunal followed its earlier larger-bench view that, in light of the scheme of the Code and Section 53, the Government cannot claim a first charge over the corporate debtor's property for purposes of insolvency distribution. On that basis, the statutory charge under the VAT Act does not override the Code or confer secured creditor status within the meaning of Sections 3(30) and 3(31) of the Code.

Conclusion: The State tax authority was not entitled to be treated as a secured creditor, and the challenge to the impugned order failed.

---