TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>SC Overturns Lower Courts, Allows Police Remand Post-Charge Sheet for Further Investigation Under Sections 167, 173(8) CrPC.</h1> <h3>Central Bureau of Investigation Versus Rathin Dandapat Chandi Karan And Anuj Pandey</h3> Central Bureau of Investigation Versus Rathin Dandapat Chandi Karan And Anuj Pandey - TMI Issues:Whether remand in police custody can be given to the investigating agency for an absconding accused arrested after the charge sheet is filed.Analysis:The case involved the killing of nine persons in a village in West Bengal. The investigation was transferred to the CBI, and a charge sheet was filed against several accused, including absconders. The absconders were later arrested, and the CBI sought their remand in police custody. However, the Magistrate rejected the remand requests, leading to appeals before the High Court and subsequently the Supreme Court.The Supreme Court examined the relevant legal provisions, including Section 167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which governs the authorization of detention by a Magistrate. The Court also considered Section 173(8), which allows for further investigation even after a charge sheet is filed. Additionally, the Court referred to Section 309, which empowers the court to remand an accused during trial.In its analysis, the Supreme Court referred to precedents such as the case of State v. Dawood Ibrahim Kaskar, which clarified that police remand can be sought for an accused arrested during further investigation. The Court highlighted that the power to detain an accused in police custody under Section 167 continues even after the filing of a charge sheet, especially if further interrogation is necessary.The Court distinguished the present case from the precedent relied upon by the High Court, emphasizing that the refusal of police remand in this instance was not in line with established legal principles. The Supreme Court reiterated that the Magistrate should consider granting police remand based on the requirements and limitations of the law, especially when an accused is arrested during further investigation.Ultimately, the Supreme Court allowed all three appeals, setting aside the orders of the High Court and the Magistrate that declined police remand. The Court directed the Magistrate to reconsider the applications for police remand in accordance with the law, emphasizing the importance of following established legal principles in such matters.
TaxTMI 