TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeals for 1994-95 and 1995-96 dismissed due to non-appearance and failure to prosecute. Adjournment request denied.</h1> The Tribunal dismissed the appeals for the assessment years 1994-95 and 1995-96 due to the assessee's consistent non-appearance and failure to prosecute. ... - Issues involved: Assessment years 1994-95 & 1995-96, appeals against orders of CIT(A)-V at Chennai u/s 143(3) read with section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.Summary:Issue 1: Non-prosecution of appealsThe Tribunal initially discussed the appeals for non-prosecution in 2006, leading to restoration petitions by the assessee. Subsequently, the appeals were heard and disposed of. The Revenue later filed Rectification Petitions for rectifying a mistake in the Tribunal's order regarding the treatment of interest income. Despite multiple instances, the assessee failed to appear for hearings, leading to dismissal of the appeals for want of prosecution.Issue 2: Adjournment requestDuring the hearing, the assessee's Counsel sought an adjournment citing being out of station for professional work. However, the Tribunal dismissed the adjournment petition due to lack of convincing details and the prolonged nature of the appeals.In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed the appeals due to the assessee's consistent non-appearance and failure to present the case adequately, emphasizing the importance of complying with legal requirements.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
