Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether inner tube valves imported for manufacture of tyre tubes were classifiable under sub-heading (2) of Heading 84.61 of the Customs Tariff as valves made of corrosion-resisting material, or under sub-heading (1) as not elsewhere specified.
Analysis: The valves were made of copper alloy and the importers produced manufacturer's certificates supporting the claim that they were made of corrosion-resisting material. The description in sub-heading (2) was held to be illustrative and not exhaustive, and the phrase referring to materials such as stainless steel, nickel monel, incoloy and hastelloy did not confine the heading to those metals alone. If the valves are in fact made of a corrosion-resisting material, they fall within sub-heading (2) notwithstanding that they are made of copper alloy.
Conclusion: The valves were classifiable under sub-heading (2) of Heading 84.61 of the Customs Tariff and not under sub-heading (1).