Imported inner tube valves made from corrosion-resistant copper alloy: classified under Heading 84.61(2), Revenue appeal rejected The dominant issue was whether imported inner tube valves were classifiable under Heading 84.61(1) as contended by the Revenue or under Heading 84.61(2) ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Imported inner tube valves made from corrosion-resistant copper alloy: classified under Heading 84.61(2), Revenue appeal rejected
The dominant issue was whether imported inner tube valves were classifiable under Heading 84.61(1) as contended by the Revenue or under Heading 84.61(2) as claimed by the importer, on the basis that they were made of corrosion-resisting material. The SC held that classification turns on whether the material is corrosion-resisting; the fact that the valves were of copper alloy did not negate that characteristic. It further held that the metals listed in sub-heading (2) (e.g., stainless steel, nickel monel, incoloy, hastelloy) were illustrative and not exhaustive, so other corrosion-resisting materials could qualify. Consequently, the valves were held classifiable under Heading 84.61(2), the impugned judgments were set aside, and the appeals were allowed without costs.
The Supreme Court ruled that inner tube valves made of corrosion-resisting material like copper alloy fall under sub-heading (2) of Heading 84.61 of the Customs Tariff. The appellants' claim was upheld, and the judgments were set aside. (Case Citation: 1997 (9) TMI 100 - Supreme Court of India)
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.