Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the continuation of the petitioner's suspension indefinitely, solely on account of a pending criminal case and charge-sheet, was legally sustainable.
Analysis: The suspension had continued beyond a reasonable period though no disciplinary proceeding had been initiated, and the criminal case was still pending. The Court applied the principle that suspension pending criminal or disciplinary proceedings cannot be continued indefinitely and must be kept within reasonable limits. It noted that while the employer may protect its interests by transferring the employee away from any sensitive posting, it cannot keep the employee out of service for an open-ended period merely because a criminal accusation is pending. The Court also relied on the Supreme Court's view that suspension should not extend beyond three months unless a charge-sheet is served and a reasoned order justifies continuation.
Conclusion: The continuation of suspension was held unsustainable and was set aside. The petitioner was directed to be allowed to resume duties, with liberty to the bank to assign an alternative posting, and to receive regular salary and emoluments on resumption.
Ratio Decidendi: An employee cannot be kept under indefinite suspension merely because a criminal case is pending; continuation of suspension must be reasonable, justified by a reasoned order, and may be avoided by reassignment to a non-sensitive post.