Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a pro forma defendant who has not filed a written statement and is not an adverse party can examine or cross-examine the plaintiff's witnesses, either friendly or otherwise.
Analysis: The scheme of Sections 137 and 138 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 confines examination, cross-examination, and re-examination to the party who calls the witness and the adverse party. Section 5 further shows that evidence is admissible only in relation to facts in issue and relevant facts. A defendant who has not put forward a contesting case by pleading and whose asserted interest is not presently adverse to the plaintiff cannot claim a right of cross-examination merely because it is named as a defendant. On the facts found, the pro forma defendant had not established an independent contesting position and sought to participate without the status of an adverse party.
Conclusion: The pro forma defendant had no right to examine, cross-examine, or friendly cross-examine the plaintiff's witnesses, nor any right to lead its own evidence in that capacity.
Final Conclusion: The request to participate in the examination of witnesses was rejected, and the pro forma defendant was held not entitled to act as an adverse party for purposes of evidence.
Ratio Decidendi: The right to examine or cross-examine a witness under the Evidence Act belongs only to the calling party and the adverse party, and a non-contesting defendant without pleadings cannot claim that right merely by being impleaded.