Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to the benefit of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 on the basis that the service tax liability had been admitted and quantified before the cut-off date, notwithstanding the pendency of audit or investigation, and whether the rejection of the SVLDRS application and consequential order could be sustained.
Analysis: The admitted liability had been quantified by the petitioner before 30 June 2019. The Scheme and the clarificatory circulars treat a written communication of duty liability, including an admission made during enquiry, investigation or audit, as quantification for the purpose of eligibility. Pendency of enquiry, investigation or audit by itself does not exclude the assessee where quantification had already occurred before the cut-off date. The earlier dismissal as infructuous did not bar the present challenge on res judicata, since no issue had been finally determined in the earlier round.
Conclusion: The petitioner was eligible for the Scheme and the rejection of the claim could not be sustained.
Final Conclusion: The impugned orders were set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration of the SVLDRS claim in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: For purposes of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, a pre-cut-off written admission or quantification of tax liability satisfies the requirement of quantification even if audit or investigation remains pending, and such pendency alone cannot defeat eligibility.