Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the period from 15.03.2020 to 28.02.2022 was required to be excluded while computing limitation for filing the written statement under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, and whether the refusal to condone delay and take the written statement on record was sustainable.
Analysis: The Court relied on its earlier order excluding the period from 15.03.2020 to 28.02.2022 for the purposes of limitation in all judicial and quasi-judicial proceedings under general and special laws. It treated the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 as a special law within the scope of that exclusion. Since the period for filing the written statement expired on 09.05.2020, which fell within the excluded period, the High Court ought to have excluded that time while considering limitation. The refusal to condone delay and to receive the written statement on record was therefore unsustainable.
Conclusion: The refusal to condone delay was set aside, and the written statement already filed was directed to be taken on record and considered in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: When limitation expires during the Supreme Court-ordered exclusion period for COVID-19, that period must be excluded for proceedings governed by special laws, including the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.