Natural justice may yield to bona fide national security concerns, with limited disclosure and judicial deference to executive assessment.

Natural justice ordinarily requires notice and hearing before adverse administrative action, but that requirement may be limited where the State shows a genuine national security concern. In such cases, the affected person cannot insist on full disclosure of sensitive reasons or source material, and the court may inspect the record only to test whether the security claim is bona fide. The executive remains the primary judge of national security risk, and judicial interference is restrained where disclosure would compromise security. The text states that the exception to natural justice on national security grounds was upheld and that the challenge to withdrawal of security clearance did not warrant interference on merits.

---

---

Issues: Whether the principles of natural justice can be curtailed or excluded where the State asserts that disclosure would harm national security.

Analysis: The governing framework recognizes that fairness ordinarily requires notice and hearing before adverse administrative action, but the requirement is not absolute. Where the State demonstrates that national security is genuinely implicated, the court may accept non-disclosure of sensitive material and the affected person cannot insist on full disclosure of the reasons or source material. The court may examine the file to satisfy itself that the claim of security is bona fide, but the executive remains the primary judge of national security considerations.

Conclusion: The exception to natural justice on grounds of national security was upheld, and the challenge to withdrawal of security clearance did not warrant interference on merits.

Final Conclusion: The appeal was rendered unnecessary for substantive adjudication because the security clearance had already expired, and the matter was accordingly disposed of.

Ratio Decidendi: Natural justice may yield where the State establishes a bona fide national security concern, and in such cases the court may withhold disclosure of sensitive materials while deferring to the executive's assessment of security risk.

---