Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Religious trust wins exemption despite audit report delay, highlighting importance of substance over form</h1> <h3>Navratna Sukrat Foundation Versus CPC, Bangalore</h3> The Tribunal ruled in favor of the religious trust assessee, allowing the exemption claimed under sections 11/12 despite a delay in filing the audit ... Exemption u/s 11/12 - delayed filing of Audit Report in Form 10B - procedural defect - claim made in the return of income, when the audit-report (Form No. 10B) was filed after filing of return but before processing u/s 143(1) - HELD THAT:- We are convinced that the controversy is directly settled in favour of assessee by decision in Savitri Foundation [2022 (8) TMI 1372 - ITAT MUMBAI] as following case of Mumbai Metropolitan Regional Iron & Steel Market Committee [2015 (4) TMI 512 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] non-filing of Audit Report in Form 10B along with Return of Income is merely a procedural defect which is rectifiable. If the Audit Report was available with the assessee at the time of filing of Return of Income and was not filed due to bona fide reasons the benefit of exemption under section 11 cannot be denied if otherwise assessee is eligible to claim the same - late filing of required documents would not disentitle the assessee from availing benefit of section 11 of the Act. Thus the assessee can’t be denied the benefit of exemption u/s 11 as claimed in the return of income for mere delay in filing of audit-report. We, therefore, deem it fit to remand this matter back to the file of AO for a fresh assessment. Appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purpose. Issues involved: The judgment deals with the issue of whether the assessee was entitled to exemption u/s 11/12 as claimed in the return of income, considering the filing of the audit report (Form No. 10B) after the return but before processing u/s 143(1).Comprehensive Details:Issue 1 - Entitlement to Exemption u/s 11/12:The assessee, a religious trust registered u/s 12A, claimed exemption u/s 11/12 in the return of income filed on 31.03.2017. The AO, upon processing the return u/s 143(1) on 07.08.2018, denied the exemption citing the non-filing of the audit report with the return. Subsequently, the assessee filed a rectification application u/s 154, which was rejected by the AO on 11.04.2019. The CIT(A) also dismissed the appeal. The issue revolved around the timing of filing the audit report and whether the delay should disentitle the assessee from the claimed exemption.Arguments by the Assessee:The AR argued that the delay in filing the audit report was due to inadvertent human error and that the assessee, engaged in genuine religious activities, should not be denied legitimate exemption. The AR emphasized that the audit report was available at the time of filing the return and was subsequently filed before the processing by the AO u/s 143(1). The AR relied on a recent decision by ITAT in a similar case where exemption was allowed due to the rectification of the audit report during the first appeal process.Arguments by the Revenue:The DR contended that the requirement of filing the audit report along with the return is a pre-condition for claiming exemption u/s 11, and the denial by lower authorities was justified.Judgment and Decision:The Tribunal, after considering the arguments and precedents, held in favor of the assessee. Citing the decision in Savitri Foundation, the Tribunal concluded that the delay in filing the audit report was a procedural defect that should not disentitle the assessee from claiming the exemption. The Tribunal remanded the matter back to the AO for a fresh assessment after considering the audit report, thereby allowing the appeal of the assessee for statistical purposes.Conclusion:The judgment emphasizes that procedural delays, if rectifiable and not intentional, should not deprive genuine entities like religious trusts from availing legitimate exemptions under the Income-tax Act. The decision underscores the importance of substance over form in tax matters, ensuring fairness and adherence to the spirit of the law.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found