Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal partially allows appeal, directs deletion of certain additions. Assessee withdraws grounds on transfer pricing and education cess.</h1> <h3>Unilever Industries Pvt Ltd., Versus ACIT, Range – 1 (3) (1)</h3> The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by directing the deletion of additions related to unrealized foreign exchange loss and ESOP expenses. The grounds ... Disallowance of foreign exchange loss by the AO and confirmed by the DRP - HELD THAT:- As relying on case Woodward Governor India [2009 (4) TMI 4 - SUPREME COURT] we direct the Assessing officer to delete the addition of foreign exchange loss. ESOP scheme & expenditure and provisions of law on the allowability of claim - HELD THAT:- We found that in the case of CIT(LTU) VS M/S Biocon Ltd [2020 (11) TMI 779 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] as held deduction of discount on ESOP over the vesting period is in accordance with the accounting in the books of accounts, which has been prepared in accordance with Securities And Exchange Board of India (Employee Stock Option Scheme and Employee Stock Purchase Scheme) Guidelines, 1999. Assessee has incurred a definite legal liability and on following the mercantile system of accounting, the discount on ESOPs has rightly been debited as expenditure in the books of accounts. We are in respectful agreement with the view taken in PVP Ventures Ltd. [2012 (7) TMI 696 - MADRAS HIGH COURT] And Lemon Tree Hotels Ltd. [2015 (11) TMI 404 - DELHI HIGH COURT] Decided in favour of assessee. Issues Involved:1. Transfer Pricing Adjustments2. Disallowance of Unrealized Foreign Exchange Loss3. Disallowance of Employee Share Option Scheme (ESOP) Expense4. Deduction in respect of Education CessIssue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Transfer Pricing Adjustments:The assessee contested the adjustments made by the AO/TPO regarding the arm's length price of international transactions. These adjustments included Rs. 9,38,84,840 for scientific and technical services, Rs. 48,61,66,505 for enterprise support services, and Rs. 98,10,00,000 for royalty income. The assessee argued that the AO/TPO disregarded functionally comparable companies and failed to exclude pass-through costs from operating revenues and costs. The DRP directed the AO/TPO to revise these adjustments, resulting in a reduction of the total adjustment to Rs. 5,43,29,788. However, the grounds related to these adjustments were withdrawn by the assessee following the conclusion of an Advance Pricing Agreement (APA).2. Disallowance of Unrealized Foreign Exchange Loss:The AO disallowed an unrealized foreign exchange loss of Rs. 2,78,362, considering it merely an accounting entry and contingent in nature. The assessee argued that, as per mercantile accounting and applicable accounting standards, such losses should be allowed as they are marked to market on the closing balance sheet date. The Tribunal referred to the Supreme Court decision in CIT Vs. Woodward Governor India (P) Ltd., which held that loss due to foreign exchange difference as on the balance sheet date is an allowable expenditure under section 37(1). Consequently, the Tribunal directed the AO to delete the addition of the foreign exchange loss.3. Disallowance of Employee Share Option Scheme (ESOP) Expense:The AO disallowed ESOP expenses of Rs. 30,41,00,000, deeming them contingent, notional, and capital in nature. The assessee contended that these expenses are revenue in nature and should be allowed under section 37(1) as they are incurred to incentivize and retain employees. The Tribunal referred to the Karnataka High Court decision in CIT(LTU) Vs. M/s Biocon Ltd., which established that ESOP expenses are an ascertained liability and deductible under section 37(1). The Tribunal followed this precedent and directed the AO to delete the addition, allowing the ESOP expenses as deductible.4. Deduction in respect of Education Cess:The ground related to the deduction of education cess was not pressed by the assessee and was subsequently withdrawn.Conclusion:The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of additions related to the unrealized foreign exchange loss and ESOP expenses, while the grounds related to transfer pricing adjustments and education cess were withdrawn by the assessee. The order was pronounced on 02.01.2023.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found