1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Kerala HC rules against appellant in income tax appeal, following precedent.</h1> The Kerala HC, in 2018 (11) TMI 1938, ruled against the appellant in an income tax appeal, following the precedent set in Popular Vehicles and Services ... Failure to pay the employees' contribution under the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 and the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 before the due date provided under the said enactments - HELD THAT:- The issue raised in the above I.T. Appeal is covered against the assessee in Popular Vehicles and Services Pvt. Ltd [2018 (8) TMI 133 - KERALA HIGH COURT] Hence following the aforesaid decision, the questions of law are answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue. The Kerala High Court judgment in 2018 (11) TMI 1938 ruled against the appellant in an income tax appeal, citing a previous decision in Popular Vehicles and Services Pvt. Ltd., C.I.T., [2018] 406 ITR 150 (Ker.). The questions of law were answered in favor of the Revenue, leading to the rejection of the appeal.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
