TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Revenue's appeal dismissed by CESTAT Chennai on service tax for services from abroad pre-16-8-2002.</h1> <h3>COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., TIRUNELVELI Versus SUNDARAM TEXTILES LTD.</h3> The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI. The Tribunal ruled that recipients were not liable to pay interest ... Whether the respondents were liable to pay interest u/s 75 on the amount of service tax paid by them on the services received from abroad for the period 28-2-1999 to 16-8-2002 – service tax on ‘import of services’ was introduced only w.e.f. 16-8-2002 vide Notification No. 12/2002 - since there was no service tax liability before 16-8-02, there cannot be any interest liability either – revenue appeal is dismissed The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI. The question was whether the respondents were liable to pay interest under Section 75 of the Finance Act, 1994 on service tax paid for services received from abroad before 16-8-2002. The Tribunal ruled that before 16-8-2002, recipients like the respondents were not liable to pay service tax on services from non-resident providers without offices in India, so there was no interest liability. The impugned order was sustained, and the appeal was dismissed on 4-7-2008.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
