Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for the relevant assessment year, the final assessment order was barred by limitation where no variation in the returned income or loss was proposed and, consequently, no draft assessment order under section 144C(1) was required.
Analysis: The assessee's case involved only the rate of tax on income already returned, and there was no variation in the returned income or loss. On those facts, the statutory mechanism under section 144C(1) was held inapplicable. The applicable time limit for completing the assessment therefore remained governed by section 153, and the later issuance of a draft assessment order could not extend or enlarge that limitation. Since the final assessment was passed after the expiry of the prescribed period, it was held to be time barred.
Conclusion: The assessment order was quashed as time barred, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.