TaxTMI Login
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
TaxTMI 
Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Writ petitions allowed in Punjab and Haryana High Court after show cause notices issued</h1> <h3>Shree Balaji Aromatics Pvt. Ltd., Hindustan Mint and Agro Products Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner, Central Goods and Services Tax, Chandigarh.</h3> The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the writ petitions in multiple cases with identical facts and issues after show cause notices were issued for ... Adjudication not finalised even after lapse of more than 10 years - Denial of CENVAT Credit - recovery of rebate claim - petitioner purchased their raw material from J & K based manufacturer who did not purchase any crude Mentha oil from the farmers - HELD THAT:- The decision in the case of M/S MENTHA & ALLIED PRODUCTS LTD THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE SATYA NARAIAN VERSUS COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL GOODS & SERVICE TAX, CHANDIGARH AND M/S ARORA AROMATICS PVT. LTD. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS [2020 (12) TMI 1230 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] would cover the case of the petitioners in their favour, where it was held that The show cause notices having been issued long back more than a decade are not sustainable in the eyes of law, and thus, deserve to be quashed. Petition allowed. The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of multiple cases with identical facts and issues. Show cause notices were issued for the years 2008 and 2010. The judgment in a previous case favored the petitioners, so the writ petitions were allowed accordingly.
TaxTMI 
