ATM classification under customs law turns on automated deposit and balance-enquiry functions, not immediate manual crediting.

For customs classification, a machine qualifies as an ATM if it provides automated cash dispensing together with deposit-related and balance-enquiry functions without direct contact with bank personnel. A model lacking any cash or cheque depository facility is only an automatic cash dispenser and does not meet the ATM description, so exemption for imported components is unavailable. Where the machine has cash and cheque collection facilities and performs the required automated banking functions, the absence of immediate manual crediting does not disqualify it as an ATM, and exemption under Notification No. 25/2005-Cus. applies.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the P77 model machines were Automatic Teller Machines or only Automatic Cash Dispensers, and whether the imported components used in their manufacture were entitled to exemption under Notification No. 25/2005-Cus.; (ii) Whether the P75 model machines were Automatic Teller Machines and whether the imported components used in their manufacture were entitled to exemption under the same notification.

Issue (i): Whether the P77 model machines were Automatic Teller Machines or only Automatic Cash Dispensers, and whether the imported components used in their manufacture were entitled to exemption under Notification No. 25/2005-Cus.

Analysis: The P77 model had no cash or cheque depository facility. The HSN description and the Board's Circular treated an ATM as a machine that not only dispenses cash but also permits other banking transactions, including deposit-related functions. A machine capable only of dispensing cash does not satisfy that description.

Conclusion: The P77 model was not an ATM but only an Automatic Cash Dispenser, and the exemption was not available to the imported components used in its manufacture.

Issue (ii): Whether the P75 model machines were Automatic Teller Machines and whether the imported components used in their manufacture were entitled to exemption under the same notification.

Analysis: The P75 model had cash and cheque collection facility in addition to cash dispensing and other banking functions. The depository function operated automatically to the extent required by the HSN and the Board's Circular, namely, deposit through the machine without direct contact with bank personnel and balance enquiry through the machine. The absence of instantaneous manual credit of the deposited amount did not disqualify it as an ATM.

Conclusion: The P75 model was an ATM, and the imported components used in its manufacture were entitled to exemption under Notification No. 25/2005-Cus.

Final Conclusion: The appeals succeeded only in relation to the P75 model, while the challenge relating to the P77 model failed, resulting in modification of the Commissioner's orders accordingly.

Ratio Decidendi: For customs classification purposes, a machine qualifies as an ATM if it provides automated deposit-related and balance-enquiry functions without direct contact with bank personnel, even if final manual verification or crediting is done later by the bank.

---