TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether the application for provisional release of goods required consideration by the Respondent; (ii) whether the Petitioner was entitled to the presence of counsel during investigation and videography of the statement recording.
Analysis: The Respondent was directed to decide the provisional release application on its own merits and in accordance with law within a specified time. The Petitioner was also permitted the presence of an Advocate at visible but not audible distance, along with videography of the statement recording at the Petitioner's expense.
Outcome: The petition was disposed of with directions granting partial relief to the Petitioner.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
