Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a dispute between a borrower and a credit institution concerning the credit information supplied to a credit information company can be referred to conciliation or arbitration under Section 18 of the Credit Information Companies (Regulation) Act, 2005 read with Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Analysis: The statutory scheme of the Credit Information Companies (Regulation) Act, 2005 shows that a credit information company carries on business only in relation to credit information collected, processed and collated from its member credit institutions and then supplied to specified users. Section 18 provides a dispute-resolution mechanism only for disputes arising on matters relating to the business of credit information and only where no other remedy is provided under the Act. A dispute between a borrower and a credit institution regarding the correctness or furnishing of such information is not, by itself, a dispute relating to the business of credit information. The mechanism under Section 18 is therefore not available for such a dispute.
Conclusion: The request for appointment of an arbitrator was not maintainable under Section 18 of the Act and the application failed.