1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appeals Dismissed for Non-Compliance with Customs Act Provision</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD dismissed the appeals for non-compliance with the provision of Section 129 E of the Customs Act, 1962 due to ... Maintainability of appeal - non-compliance with the provision of Section 129 E of Customs Act, 1962, by making pre-deposit of the requisite amount - HELD THAT:- The matter has been listed under the category βMention Matterβ. The appeals are non-maintainable on account of non-compliance with the provision of Section 129 E of Customs Act, 1962, by making pre-deposit of the requisite amount. The appeals are dismissed as non-maintainable. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD dismissed the appeals as non-maintainable because the appellants did not comply with the provision of Section 129 E of the Customs Act, 1962 by making the required pre-deposit. The appeals were listed as 'Mention Matter' and the Registry issued a defect memo accordingly. The appeals were dismissed and MAs disposed of.