Appeals Dismissed for Non-Compliance with Customs Act Provision The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD dismissed the appeals for non-compliance with the provision of Section 129 E of the Customs Act, 1962 due to ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appeals Dismissed for Non-Compliance with Customs Act Provision
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD dismissed the appeals for non-compliance with the provision of Section 129 E of the Customs Act, 1962 due to failure to make the required pre-deposit. The appeals were listed as 'Mention Matter,' and after the Registry issued a defect memo, the appeals were dismissed, and Motion Applications were disposed of.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD dismissed the appeals as non-maintainable because the appellants did not comply with the provision of Section 129 E of the Customs Act, 1962 by making the required pre-deposit. The appeals were listed as 'Mention Matter' and the Registry issued a defect memo accordingly. The appeals were dismissed and MAs disposed of.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.