Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the bank was justified in treating the restructuring proposal as not implemented by the cut-off date and cancelling the sanctioned restructuring letter, and whether the consequent action under the SARFAESI regime could be sustained.
Analysis: The restructuring circular required implementation by 31 March 2021. The sanctioned restructuring letter was issued on 30 March 2021, which satisfied the requirement of implementation in substance, subject to fulfilment of the stipulated conditions. The bank's view that all formalities had to be completed by the cut-off date was held to be an incorrect reading of the circular. The cancellation letter did not disclose any specific breach of the sanctioned conditions, and the subsequent classification of the account as NPA and initiation of SARFAESI action were founded on that incorrect premise. The authorities relied on by the bank were distinguished because they did not involve an already sanctioned restructuring proposal.
Conclusion: The cancellation of the restructuring sanction and the consequential communication were quashed. The sanctioned restructuring letter was held to remain operative and the parties were directed to act on it.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a restructuring sanction is issued within the RBI-prescribed implementation period, the restructuring cannot be treated as unimplemented merely because post-sanction formalities remain to be completed, and action taken on an erroneous contrary interpretation is liable to be set aside.