Confiscated goods sale proceeds go to Government if no fine paid; penalty can still apply. Order for sale proceeds payment without deduction of fine was incorrect.

The Tribunal held that when goods are confiscated and the party does not opt to pay the fine, the sale proceeds vest with the Government, and penalty under Section 112 can still be imposed. The order for payment of sale proceeds without deduction of redemption fine was incorrect. The issue of whether the party can opt to pay the fine at this stage remains open for consideration by the Division Bench.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Confiscation of imported goods and the imposition of redemption fine and penalty.
2. Auctioning of goods during the pendency of the appeal.
3. Entitlement to sale proceeds after auction.
4. Validity of imposing redemption fine when goods are auctioned.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Confiscation of Imported Goods and Imposition of Redemption Fine and Penalty:
The respondent imported marbles, which are restricted goods under the EXIM Policy and require a license. Sixteen containers arrived at ICD, Tughlakabad, New Delhi, but were not cleared within the stipulated 30 days as per Section 48 of the Customs Act, 1962. Consequently, seven show cause notices were issued under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, proposing confiscation and penalty under Section 112. The Additional Commissioner of Customs ordered the confiscation of goods valued at Rs. 59,07,768/- and imposed a redemption fine of Rs. 20 lakhs and a penalty of Rs. 10 lakhs. The respondent's appeal was dismissed as it was filed beyond the prescribed period without seeking condonation of delay.

2. Auctioning of Goods During Pendency of Appeal:
The goods were auctioned by the Department between May 2013 and June 2013. The respondent informed the adjudicating authority about the appeal on 28.04.2014. The Commissioner (Appeals) condoned the delay and partly allowed the appeal, setting aside the redemption fine and directing the sale proceeds to be paid to the respondent after deducting the penalty amount. The Commissioner (Appeals) noted that the Department should not have auctioned the goods while the appeal was pending and the importer had not exhausted all legal remedies.

3. Entitlement to Sale Proceeds After Auction:
The Commissioner (Appeals) held that since the goods were auctioned, the respondent could not be compelled to pay the redemption fine as they had no option left to redeem the goods. The sale proceeds were to be paid to the respondent after deducting the penalty amount. The Tribunal, however, noted that confiscated goods vest in the Government under Section 126 of the Customs Act, and the sale proceeds replace the goods. Thus, the sale proceeds should be paid to the importer only after deducting the redemption fine and penalty.

4. Validity of Imposing Redemption Fine When Goods Are Auctioned:
The Tribunal examined conflicting decisions and concluded that once goods are confiscated and auctioned, the sale proceeds represent the goods. Therefore, the redemption fine should be deducted from the sale proceeds. The Tribunal rejected the view that redemption fine cannot be imposed once goods are auctioned, as it would encourage importers to delay redemption until auction. The Tribunal emphasized that the property in the goods vests in the Government upon confiscation, and the sale proceeds replace the goods.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal held that when goods are confiscated and the party does not opt to pay the fine, the sale proceeds vest with the Government, and penalty under Section 112 can still be imposed. The order for payment of sale proceeds without deduction of redemption fine was incorrect. The issue of whether the party can opt to pay the fine at this stage remains open for consideration by the Division Bench.

---