Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the batch of writ petitions concerning e-notices under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 required detailed examination in light of the timing of issuance, dispatch and service of the notices, and whether interim protection should be granted pending final adjudication.
Analysis: The order noted multiple categories of notices based on whether they were dated on or before 31 March 2021, digitally signed before or after 1 April 2021, and sent or received after that date. It also noticed the view expressed in the cited judgment that mere digital signing is not issuance of notice and that the time of entry of the electronic record outside the control of the originator is relevant. In view of these considerations, the Court recorded that the matters required detailed examination and that an immediate judgment was not feasible before the assessment deadline in most cases.
Outcome: Proceedings pursuant to the impugned reassessment notices were stayed till further orders.