Lookout circular and Section 41A notice dispute remained undecided after clarification that the circular related to a different FIR.

A challenge to a lookout circular and related coercive action was not decided on the merits at that stage because the respondents stated that notice under Section 41A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 had been served, the State did not oppose quashing in relation to one FIR, and the lookout circular referred to by the Union of India pertained to a different FIR. In light of those clarifications, the court declined final adjudication of the prayer clauses then pressed and directed the matter to be renotified for further consideration.

---

---

Issues: Whether the lookout circular concerning the petitioner, stated to have been issued in connection with different FIRs, required final adjudication at this stage, and whether the notice under Section 41A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 having been served, any coercive action survived for consideration.

Analysis: The respondents placed on record that the notice under Section 41A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 had been served and that the State did not oppose the prayer for quashing in relation to one FIR, while also clarifying that the lookout circular referred to by the Union of India pertained to a different FIR. The matter was therefore not taken up for a substantive decision on the merits of the prayer clauses then pressed.

Outcome: No final adjudication was made on the merits of the challenge at that stage, and the matter was directed to be renotified for further consideration.

---