TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Validity of Income Tax Act Section 148 Notices Clarified by Gujarat High Court</h1> <h3>KANJANI MANOHARLAL BANSILAL HUF THRO MANOHARLAL BANSILAL KANJANI Versus UNION OF INDIA</h3> KANJANI MANOHARLAL BANSILAL HUF THRO MANOHARLAL BANSILAL KANJANI Versus UNION OF INDIA - TMI Issues Involved:1. Validity of notices issued under unamended Section 148 of the Income Tax Act.2. Application of the Supreme Court's judgment in Union of India vs. Ashish Agarwal.3. Liberty to file fresh writ applications for other issues beyond Section 148 of the Income Tax Act.Detailed Analysis:Validity of Notices Issued Under Unamended Section 148 of the Income Tax Act:The core issue in these writ applications was the validity of notices issued under the unamended Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The High Court of Gujarat addressed multiple writ applications collectively, focusing on the recent pronouncement by the Supreme Court in the case of Union of India vs. Ashish Agarwal. The Supreme Court's judgment had significant implications, as it addressed the status of such notices issued post-1st April 2021.Application of the Supreme Court's Judgment in Union of India vs. Ashish Agarwal:The Supreme Court's judgment in Union of India vs. Ashish Agarwal (Civil Appeal No. 3005 of 2022) was pivotal. The Supreme Court allowed the appeals in part and modified the impugned judgments and orders from various High Courts. The relevant observations from the Supreme Court included:- Deemed Issuance Under Section 148A: Notices issued under the unamended Section 148 were to be deemed as issued under Section 148A of the IT Act, as substituted by the Finance Act, 2021. These were to be treated as show-cause notices under Section 148A(b). The assessing officer was required to provide information and material relied upon within thirty days, allowing the assessees to reply within two weeks.- Dispensation of Enquiry Requirement: The requirement for conducting an enquiry with prior approval under Section 148A(a) was dispensed with as a one-time measure for notices issued between 1st April 2021 and the date of the judgment.- Procedure Under Section 148A(d): Assessing officers were to pass orders in terms of Section 148A(d) and follow the procedure under Section 148A before issuing notices under the substituted Section 148.- Availability of Defenses and Rights: All defenses and rights available to the assessees and the Revenue under the Finance Act, 2021, and in law, were to continue to be available.The Supreme Court's order was to be applicable PAN INDIA, affecting all similar judgments and orders from various High Courts.Liberty to File Fresh Writ Applications for Other Issues:The Gujarat High Court clarified that if any particular matter involved issues other than Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the concerned writ applicant retained the liberty to file a fresh writ application in accordance with the law. This reservation ensured that other legal grievances could still be addressed separately.Conclusion:All the captioned writ applications were disposed of in line with the Supreme Court's order in Union of India vs. Ashish Agarwal. The High Court emphasized the applicability of the Supreme Court's directives PAN INDIA and allowed for the possibility of fresh writ applications for issues beyond Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
