Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal directs Assessing Officer to use 3% net profit rate</h1> <h3>Bathinda Truck Operator Union Versus Income Tax Officer Ward-1 (3)</h3> Bathinda Truck Operator Union Versus Income Tax Officer Ward-1 (3) - TMI Issues Involved:1. Application of net profit rate of 10% on gross receipts.2. Sustaining the disallowance of expenses of Rs. 3,00,197 out of expenses claimed at Rs. 10,35,197.3. Exemption of income on the principle of mutuality.4. Justification of income estimation by the Assessing Officer.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Application of Net Profit Rate of 10% on Gross Receipts:The primary issue in dispute was whether the CIT(A) was justified in applying a net profit rate of 10% on the gross receipts of Rs. 4,45,42,701. The Assessing Officer estimated the income by applying this rate due to the non-production of books of account, details, bills, and vouchers by the assessee. The CIT(A) upheld this estimation, but the Tribunal found this approach to be arbitrary and without basis. The Tribunal noted that the Assessing Officer did not refer to past history or comparable cases to justify the 10% rate. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to compute the income by applying a net profit rate of 3% instead.2. Sustaining the Disallowance of Expenses:The Assessing Officer had allowed expenses of Rs. 7,35,000 out of the total claimed expenses of Rs. 10,35,197, disallowing Rs. 3,00,197. The CIT(A) upheld this disallowance, noting the lack of details and evidence provided by the assessee. The Tribunal agreed with the authorities that due to the absence of books and vouchers, the disallowance was reasonable. However, since the income was to be computed by applying a net profit rate of 3%, the Tribunal directed that no further deduction for expenses should be allowed.3. Exemption of Income on the Principle of Mutuality:The assessee argued that its income was exempt based on the principle of mutuality, as it was a society formed for collective bargaining and providing facilities to its members without the intent of making a profit. The CIT(A) rejected this claim, relying on the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court in the case of Sumerpur Truck Operators Union v. ITO. The Tribunal did not address this issue further as it was no longer a subject of dispute before them.4. Justification of Income Estimation by the Assessing Officer:The Tribunal emphasized that even when book results are rejected, the Assessing Officer is duty-bound to make a fair and reasonable estimate of income based on evidence and material on record. The Tribunal criticized the Assessing Officer for not making independent inquiries or referring to comparable cases. The Tribunal highlighted that the society did not own any trucks and collected only a small percentage of fees for its upkeep. The Tribunal referred to past cases, including a decision by the CIT(A) for the subsequent assessment year where a net profit rate of 3% was applied, and another case where a 3% rate was accepted by the Department. The Tribunal concluded that applying a 10% rate was arbitrary and directed the Assessing Officer to apply a 3% net profit rate instead.Conclusion:The Tribunal set aside the orders of the authorities below and directed the Assessing Officer to compute the income by applying a net profit rate of 3% on the freight receipts, union fee, and collection from Truck Operators. The appeal was partly allowed, providing a fair and reasonable resolution based on the evidence and material on record.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found