High Court disposes appeal citing precedent judgments on substantial questions of law The Bombay High Court disposed of the appeal, stating that the substantial questions of law proposed were covered by two judgments: CIT v. Carlyle India ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
High Court disposes appeal citing precedent judgments on substantial questions of law
The Bombay High Court disposed of the appeal, stating that the substantial questions of law proposed were covered by two judgments: CIT v. Carlyle India Advisors (P) Ltd. (2013) 357 ITR 584 (Bom) and CIT v. Temasek Holding Advisors India Pvt Ltd.
The Bombay High Court disposed of the appeal stating that the substantial questions of law proposed were covered by two judgments: CIT Vs. Carlyle India Advisors (P) Ltd. (2013) 357 ITR 584 (Bom) and CIT Vs. Temasek Holding Advisors India Pvt Ltd.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.