Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Industrial Court Orders Prompt Recovery of Dues for Workmen, Rejects Installment Plan</h1> <h3>Satish Arjun Surve Versus State of Maharashtra and Ors.</h3> The court directed the State Government, Collector Mumbai, and the Registrar, Industrial Court to expedite the recovery of amounts under Recovery ... - Issues Involved:1. Expeditious recovery of amounts under Recovery Certificates issued in favor of workmen.2. Application of Rule 17 of Maharashtra Realisation of Land Revenue Rules, 1967.3. Role and responsibilities of the authorities under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code.4. Specific cases involving the National Textile Corporation (NTC) and its obligations.5. Suggestions for improving the recovery process.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Expeditious Recovery of Amounts under Recovery Certificates:The petitioners sought a directive for the State Government, Collector Mumbai, and the Registrar, Industrial Court to take appropriate steps to recover amounts under Recovery Certificates issued in their favor. These certificates were issued under Section 33-C(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, which mandates that the Collector proceed to recover the dues as arrears of land revenue. The court noted that despite a previous directive to expedite such recoveries within three months, the authorities had not taken adequate steps, leading to delays and compelling workmen to approach the court for relief.2. Application of Rule 17 of Maharashtra Realisation of Land Revenue Rules, 1967:The court examined Rule 17, which outlines the procedure for recovering sums as arrears of land revenue. The authorities had been insisting on compliance with this rule by requiring the Industrial Court to forward details of the defaulter's properties. The court found this practice unjustified, noting that the Industrial Court is neither a department nor an entity contemplated by Rule 17. The court directed that there is no obligation on the Industrial Court to forward any requisition, and the authorities should not call upon it to furnish details of the defaulter's assets.3. Role and Responsibilities of Authorities under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code:The court emphasized that the authorities under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code must act diligently in recovering amounts under recovery certificates. The Collector should initiate proceedings for recovery in accordance with the Code, serving a written notice of demand on the defaulter and following up with further processes, including the sale of properties if necessary. The court stressed that the authorities must prioritize the recovery of workmen's dues as they would for land revenue and taxes.4. Specific Cases Involving National Textile Corporation (NTC) and Its Obligations:The court addressed specific cases involving the NTC, where significant sums were due to workmen. The NTC argued that it was challenging to manage sick mills and requested to pay the dues in installments. The court rejected this request, directing the NTC to clear the liabilities by paying monthly installments of Rs. 5 lakhs for Kohinoor Mills and Rs. 3 lakhs for other units until the entire liability is cleared. The court warned that failure to comply with these directions would result in the authorities being held responsible for breach of the court's orders.5. Suggestions for Improving the Recovery Process:The court suggested that instead of forwarding recovery certificates to the Collectorates, recoveries could be made by appointing a Recovery Officer in the concerned Industrial Court/Labour Court. This measure was left for the decision of the respondent No. 1. The court also emphasized that all Collectors in Maharashtra must promptly recover dues under valid recovery certificates and remove any obstacles hindering the recovery process.Conclusion:The petitions were disposed of with directives to ensure the expeditious recovery of dues under recovery certificates, emphasizing the authorities' responsibilities and rejecting the NTC's request for extended time to pay dues. The court's observations and directions were to apply to all workers and employees with valid recovery certificates, urging the authorities to act diligently and prioritize the recovery of workmen's dues.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found