Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Supreme Court 2016 ruling favors petitioner in case heard with SLP - unrepresented respondent.</h1> <h3>Commissioner of Income Tax, (Central) –III Versus Kabul Chawla</h3> The Supreme Court of India in 2016 (2) TMI 1346 - SC, ruled in favor of the petitioner, with Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph and Hon'ble Mr. Justice ... Assesment u/s 153A - Completed Assessment - Whether additions made to the income of the Assessee for the AYs were not sustainable because no incriminating material concerning such additions were found during the course of search and further no assessments for such years were pending on the date of search? SLP tagged with the case of MGF AUTOMOBILES LTD [2016 (7) TMI 1448 - SC ORDER] The Supreme Court of India passed an order in 2016 (2) TMI 1346 - SC, with Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman presiding. The petitioner was represented by Mrs. Diksha Rai, Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Mrs. Anil Katiyar, and Mr. B.V. Balram Das. The respondent did not have representation. The case was posted along with SLP (C)......CC No. 3132 of 2016.