Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2019 (6) TMI 1682 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Insurance Company's TDS on Interest Upheld by High Court, Lump Sum Deduction Required The High Court upheld the Insurance Company's decision to deduct TDS on the interest paid as part of the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Insurance Company's TDS on Interest Upheld by High Court, Lump Sum Deduction Required

                          The High Court upheld the Insurance Company's decision to deduct TDS on the interest paid as part of the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. The Court clarified that TDS should be deducted on the entire interest amount as a lump sum, regardless of the period over which the interest is calculated. The claimants were advised to seek a refund from the Income Tax Department if they believed excess tax was deducted. The Court emphasized the strict interpretation of exemption provisions in favor of revenue, confirming the Insurance Company's liability to deduct TDS under relevant sections of the Income Tax Act.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Liability of the Insurance Company to deduct TDS on the interest paid on compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal.
                          2. Applicability of Section 145-B and Section 194-A of the Income Tax Act concerning the deduction of TDS on interest from compensation.
                          3. The distinction between compensation awarded under the Motor Vehicles Act and the Land Acquisition Act regarding the deduction of TDS on interest.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Liability of the Insurance Company to deduct TDS on the interest paid on compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal:
                          The core issue revolves around whether the Insurance Company was correct in deducting TDS on the interest amount paid as part of the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. The respondents argued that the interest should be spread over the years from the date of filing the claim, and TDS should only be deducted if the interest for any particular year exceeds Rs. 50,000. The Tribunal initially ruled in favor of the claimants, directing the Insurance Company to deposit the deducted TDS amount. However, the High Court found that the Insurance Company correctly deducted TDS on the entire interest amount, as the compensation and interest were to be paid as a lump sum, and apportionment among claimants was to occur only after the deposit.

                          2. Applicability of Section 145-B and Section 194-A of the Income Tax Act concerning the deduction of TDS on interest from compensation:
                          The legal provisions under scrutiny were Section 145-B and Section 194-A of the Income Tax Act. Section 145-B(1) stipulates that interest received on compensation is deemed income of the year it is received. Section 194-A(3)(ix) and (ix-a) specify that TDS must be deducted if the interest on compensation exceeds Rs. 50,000 in a financial year. The High Court concluded that these sections, when read together, mandate the deduction of TDS if the total interest exceeds Rs. 50,000, irrespective of the period over which the interest is calculated.

                          3. The distinction between compensation awarded under the Motor Vehicles Act and the Land Acquisition Act regarding the deduction of TDS on interest:
                          The High Court differentiated between compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act and the Land Acquisition Act. In the latter, compensation entitlement starts from the date of possession, while in motor accident cases, entitlement arises only after the award is passed. The Court noted that precedents cited by the respondents, which pertained to land acquisition, were not applicable to motor accident claims. The Court emphasized that the principle of strict interpretation of exemption provisions should apply, and any ambiguity should benefit the revenue, not the taxpayer.

                          Conclusion:
                          The High Court set aside the Tribunal's order, holding that the Insurance Company was correct in deducting TDS on the interest paid on compensation. The claimants, if they believe excess tax was deducted, have the option to seek a refund from the Income Tax Department. The petition by the Insurance Company was allowed, confirming their liability to deduct TDS as per Section 194-A(3)(ix) and (ix-a) of the Income Tax Act.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found