Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether area based exemption continued to be available despite change of ownership and change of plot, and whether the matter required remand for verification of whether the purchased gold unit had been availing the exemption.
Analysis: The exemption notification was understood, with reference to the Board circulars, to permit addition or modification of plant and machinery and production of new products by an eligible unit during the exemption period. The change of ownership and change of factory premises were treated as not decisive in themselves. However, the core factual question remained whether the gold unit purchased by the respondent had in fact been availing the area based exemption, and that aspect required verification by the adjudicating authority.
Conclusion: The matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority to verify the factual entitlement to area based exemption in respect of the gold unit and to decide the issue afresh after giving reasonable opportunity and considering additional evidence, if necessary.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the dispute was sent back for limited factual determination on exemption entitlement.
Ratio Decidendi: An eligible unit's area based exemption is not lost merely because of change of ownership or factory premises, but factual entitlement must still be verified where the exemption claim depends on whether the unit was already enjoying the benefit.