Concurrent sentencing in multiple convictions from one transaction may be directed as consequential relief despite conviction being upheld.

Section 31 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 governs sentencing where a person is convicted of more than one offence at one trial. Where multiple convictions arise from the same transaction, the sentencing court may direct the punishments to run concurrently rather than consecutively, especially where the offences stem from one act and mitigating circumstances support that result. On the stated facts, the convictions were maintained, but the punishment was modified so that the two sentences would operate together. The principle applied is that concurrent sentencing may be granted as consequential relief in the interest of justice when several convictions in one trial arise from a single incident.

---

---

Issues: Whether the sentences imposed for offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Indian Post Office Act should run concurrently or consecutively.

Analysis: The power under Section 31 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 governs sentencing where a person is convicted of more than one offence at one trial. Where multiple punishments arise from the same transaction, the sentencing court must consider whether concurrent running of sentences is appropriate. The Court applied the established principle that, particularly where the convictions stem from one act and one trial, concurrent sentences may be directed in the interest of justice. On the facts, the offences arose from a single incident of theft, the matter was pending, and mitigating circumstances supported concurrency.

Conclusion: The sentences were directed to run concurrently instead of consecutively.

Final Conclusion: The conviction was maintained, but the punishment was modified so that the two sentences would operate together, granting partial relief to the accused.

Ratio Decidendi: Where several convictions in one trial arise from the same transaction, the appellate court may direct the sentences to run concurrently under Section 31 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and such direction can be made as consequential relief while affirming the conviction.

---