TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal upholds CIT(A)'s decision deleting Rs.24,44,772 balance amount. Revenue appeal dismissed.</h1> <h3>I.T.O., Ward-51 (4), Kolkata Versus Deb Kumar Jana</h3> The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, confirming the deletion of the balance amount of Rs.24,44,772. The appeal of the Revenue was dismissed. - ... - Issues involved: Appeal against deletion of addition of unexplained money by the ld. CIT(A).Summary:The Revenue appealed against the deletion of an addition of Rs.24,44,772 made by the AO on account of unexplained money. The AO found that the assessee had deposited cash of Rs.29,26,000 in a bank account, leading to the addition. The assessee explained that the cash was withdrawn for business purposes and redeposited. The AO rejected this explanation and added the entire deposit as unexplained investment u/s 69 of the Act. The ld. CIT(A) observed that while the deposits were unexplained, the entire amount could not be added back, relying on precedents. The CIT(A) directed the AO to consider only the peak balance as unexplained investment, leading to the deletion of Rs.24,44,772. The Revenue appealed against this decision.The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, noting that the AO had failed to show any error in the CIT(A)'s order. The Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the CIT(A)'s decision, confirming the deletion of the balance amount of Rs.24,44,772. The appeal of the Revenue was dismissed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
