Tribunal Grants Restoration of Appeal Despite Revenue's Objection

The Tribunal allowed the applicant's request for restoration of the appeal following the dismissal due to the death of the assessee and non-appearance of the legal representative. Despite contestation by the Revenue, citing lack of timely action, the Tribunal considered the exceptional circumstances, including the impact of the pandemic and the applicant's lack of legal knowledge. Relying on principles of natural justice, equity, and fair play, the Tribunal recalled the dismissal order and granted the applicant 30 days to fulfill necessary requirements to proceed with the appeal, ensuring a fair opportunity for the applicant to present her case.

---

---

Issues:
1. Appeal dismissal due to death of assessee during pendency.
2. Non-appearance of legal representative and consequences.
3. Request for restoration of appeal and opportunity for hearing.
4. Contestation by the Revenue on the application.
5. Tribunal's decision based on principles of natural justice, equity, and fair play.

Analysis:
1. The Misc. Application was filed concerning the dismissal of the main appeal (ITA No. 40/JP/2019) by the Tribunal due to the death of the assessee, Dinesh Ojha, during the pendency of the appeal. The legal representative, the wife of the deceased, was not brought on record, leading to the dismissal of the appeal on 12/10/2020.

2. The applicant, as the wife of the deceased assessee, stated that she was not aware of the legal procedures to bring on record the authorized representative due to being a housewife. She highlighted that the entire amount in question related to old debtors, and the Covid-19 pandemic hindered her from actively participating in the case.

3. The applicant requested the restoration of the appeal, an opportunity to be heard, and a fresh decision in accordance with the law. The Tribunal considered the circumstances, including the death of the assessee, the lack of appearance of the legal representative, and the impact of the pandemic on the applicant's ability to engage in the legal process.

4. The Revenue contested the application, arguing that the applicant should have timely moved an application to bring on record the authorized representative. However, the Tribunal acknowledged the exceptional circumstances and the applicant's lack of legal knowledge, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

5. The Tribunal, based on the principles of natural justice, equity, and fair play, allowed the application, recalled the order of dismissal dated 12/10/2020, and directed the applicant to comply with the necessary requirements within 30 days to proceed with the appeal. The decision aimed to uphold fairness and provide the applicant with an opportunity to present her case effectively.

---