Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was liable to be set aside on the plea that the cheques were issued only as security under the agreement and not towards discharge of a legally enforceable liability.
Analysis: The evidence established that the complainant had advanced money to the accused and that the accused had acknowledged receipt of the amount in the agreement relied upon by the defence itself. The cheques were admitted to have been issued by the accused, were presented in time, and were dishonoured for insufficiency of funds. The statutory notice was proved and there was no effective rebuttal to the complainant's version. The defence that the cheques were only security did not displace the documentary and oral evidence showing that they were issued towards repayment of the amount received. The concurrent findings of the courts below were found to be based on proper appreciation of evidence, and no illegality or infirmity was shown warranting interference in revision.
Conclusion: The conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was upheld and the defence of security cheque was rejected.