TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Notice issued for hearing on asset release petition under Income Tax Act, focusing on seized jewelry</h1> <h3>Rameshkumar Ramchandra Jaju Versus The Director General of Income Tax (Inv), Ahmedabad</h3> Rameshkumar Ramchandra Jaju Versus The Director General of Income Tax (Inv), Ahmedabad - TMI Issues Involved:Petition seeking release of assets seized under section 132 of Income Tax in relation to sibling's case, non-release of seized jewelry despite explanations and evidence provided, lack of response to communications and requests for return of jewelry.Analysis:The petitioners have approached the court to seek the release of assets seized during a search and seizure operation under section 132 of the Income Tax Act in connection with their sibling's case. Specifically, jewelry owned by the petitioners was seized during the proceedings but has not been returned despite the petitioners providing explanations regarding the source of the jewelry, its purchase details, and even presenting Wealth Tax Returns for the relevant assessment year, showing assets worth &8377; 2 Crores. The petitioners have made multiple communications and requests for the return of the jewelry, but no response has been received to date.The petitioners' advocate highlighted that in the case of the brother of the petitioners, an Assessment Order was issued on 10.03.2016, wherein no additions were made by the authorities. Furthermore, it was pointed out that the petitioner's communications regarding the seized jewelry have not been addressed by the concerned authorities. The advocate also mentioned that an appeal challenging the Assessing Officer's order has been filed, and the current status of this appeal can be provided at the next hearing. The court has issued a notice for the case to be heard on 04.10.2021, indicating that further proceedings will take place to address the issues raised by the petitioners regarding the non-release of the seized assets, particularly the jewelry.
TaxTMI 