Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Successful Approval of Panacealife Healthzone's Resolution Plan</h1> <h3>Alchemist Asset Reconstruction Company Limited Versus Panacealife Healthzone Private Limited</h3> Alchemist Asset Reconstruction Company Limited Versus Panacealife Healthzone Private Limited - TMI Issues Involved:1. Approval of the Resolution Plan under section 30(6) read with section 31(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC).2. Compliance with IBC and CIRP Regulations.3. Evaluation and voting on the Resolution Plan.4. Salient features and financial proposals of the approved Resolution Plan.5. Compliance of the successful Resolution Plan with various provisions.6. Details of Resolution Plan/Payment Schedule.7. Management/Implementation and Relief as per the Resolution Plan.8. Waivers, Reliefs, and Exemptions sought by the Resolution Applicant.9. Findings and Orders by the Tribunal.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Approval of the Resolution Plan:The application IA (IBC) No. 98/ALD/2021 was filed by the Resolution Professional (RP) for Panacealife Healthzone Private Limited under section 30(6) read with section 31(1) of the IBC for approval of the Resolution Plan. The application was filed on 22.02.2021 and approved by 100% CoC on 08.02.2021.2. Compliance with IBC and CIRP Regulations:The public announcement was made on 07.09.2020, calling for proof of claims from creditors. The claims admitted and proposed to be paid were detailed, and discrepancies in amounts were noted for clarification by the RP. Seven CoC meetings were held, and the invitation for Expression of Interest (EoI) was published on 14.11.2020. The RP received prospective plans from three applicants, with the final plan received from City Hospital.3. Evaluation and Voting:The CoC enquired about the possibility of revising the bid amount, which was declined by the Resolution Applicant. The Plan was placed for e-voting on 03.02.2021 and concluded on 08.02.2021, receiving 100% approval from the CoC.4. Salient Features and Financial Proposals:The Resolution Applicant confirmed payment of CIRP costs, Operational Creditors, and Financial Creditors within 90 days from the approval date. The amount being paid through the Resolution Plan was higher than the average liquidation value. The key financial proposals were detailed in the Resolution Plan.5. Compliance with Various Provisions:The Resolution Plan adhered to section 30(2) of the Code and mandatory contents as per regulation 38 of CIRP Regulations. The successful resolution applicant submitted the required certificates and undertakings, and a Compliance Certificate in Form H was filed.6. Details of Resolution Plan/Payment Schedule:The Resolution Plan defined the 'Effective Date' and outlined the payment schedule for CIRP costs, Operational Creditors, and Financial Creditors within 90 days from the approval date. The total plan size was approximately Rs. 36.33 crore, inclusive of future capital expenditure.7. Management/Implementation and Relief:The Resolution Plan provided for the management and control of the Corporate Debtor, implementation and supervision of the plan, and the restructuring of share capital. The Resolution Applicant and its nominees would hold 100% shareholding in the restructured share capital.8. Waivers, Reliefs, and Exemptions:Various reliefs and exemptions were sought by the Resolution Applicant, including waivers from stamp duty, taxes, and statutory liabilities. The Tribunal granted some reliefs based on the Supreme Court judgment in Ghanashyam Mishra & Sons Pvt. Ltd. v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd., while others were not granted or required compliance with existing laws.9. Findings and Orders:The Tribunal found that the Resolution Plan was approved with 100% voting share and complied with sections 30 and 31 of the Code and regulations 37, 38, and 39 of CIRP Regulations. The Resolution Plan was approved, binding on the Corporate Debtor and other stakeholders. The Moratorium under section 14 ceased, and the RP was discharged from duties, with the Resolution Applicant directed to comply with statutory obligations within one year. The application IA (IB) No. 98/ALD/2021 and Company Petition CP (IB) No. 458/ALD/2019 were disposed of accordingly.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found