Incomplete record on DTA clearance of surplus raw material led to remand for fresh adjudication.

Demand and penalties on disputed clearance of surplus imported and indigenous raw material into the Domestic Tariff Area could not be sustained on the existing record because the quantities consumed in export production, the quantities remaining, the extent of permission for DTA disposal, and whether duty had been paid were not clearly established. As the factual foundation for determining liability was incomplete, the matter required fresh examination. The impugned order was set aside and the case was remanded for de novo adjudication with a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the appellant.

---

---

Issues: Whether the demand and penalties could be sustained on the disputed clearance of surplus imported and indigenous raw material into the Domestic Tariff Area when the quantity utilised, the quantity remaining, the extent of permission granted, and the duty paid at the time of clearance were not clearly established.

Analysis: The record did not clearly show how much raw material had been consumed for export production and how much remained with the appellant. It was also uncertain what quantity or value had been permitted for DTA disposal and whether duty had in fact been paid on the clearances claimed by the appellant. In these circumstances, the factual foundation necessary for deciding the dispute was incomplete, and the matter required fresh examination by the adjudicating authority.

Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication with a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the appellant.

---