Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal confirms deduction under Section 80IA, disallows Section 14A adjustment.

        DCIT-5 (2) (1), Mumbai Versus M/s. JSW Infrastructure Ltd.

        DCIT-5 (2) (1), Mumbai Versus M/s. JSW Infrastructure Ltd. - TMI Issues Involved:
        1. Disallowance of deduction claimed under Section 80IA of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
        2. Disallowance of expenditure incurred in relation to exempt income under Section 14A read with Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules, 1962.
        3. Re-computation of book profit under Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

        Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

        1. Disallowance of Deduction Claimed under Section 80IA:

        The primary issue was whether the assessee was entitled to claim a deduction under Section 80IA for the Jaigarh unit in the revised return filed under Section 139(5), despite not making such a claim in the original return filed under Section 139(1). The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed the additional claim of Rs. 11,28,18,375 on the ground that it was not made in the original return, citing Section 80A(5) read with Section 80AC, which mandates filing the return within the due date specified under Section 139(1) for claiming any deduction.

        The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] deleted the disallowance, holding that Section 80AC requires the filing of the return within the due date specified under Section 139(1) but does not stipulate that the claim must be made in the original return. The CIT(A) relied on several judicial precedents, including the ITAT Chennai Bench decision in ACIT vs Precot Meridian Limited, which clarified that a revised return filed under Section 139(5) to rectify any omission or wrong statement in the original return can take the character of the original return. Thus, the assessee was entitled to the additional deduction claimed under Section 80IA.

        The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)’s decision, noting that the assessee had filed the original return within the due date specified under Section 139(1) and subsequently filed a revised return within the due date specified under Section 139(5), thereby fulfilling the conditions prescribed under Section 80AC.

        2. Disallowance of Expenditure Incurred in Relation to Exempt Income under Section 14A:

        The second issue was the disallowance of expenditure incurred in relation to exempt income under Section 14A read with Rule 8D. The AO made a disallowance of Rs. 13,30,85,624 under Rule 8D(2)(ii) & (iii), despite the assessee not earning any exempt income during the year.

        The CIT(A) deleted the disallowance, following the decision of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in Joint Investment Pvt. Ltd. vs CIT, which held that disallowance under Section 14A cannot exceed the amount of exempt income earned. Additionally, the CIT(A) noted that no disallowance could be made under Section 14A in the absence of any exempt income, as supported by the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in CIT vs M/s. Ballarpur Industries Ltd. and the Hon’ble Supreme Court in CIT vs Chettinad Logistics Pvt. Ltd.

        The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)’s decision, emphasizing that when there is no exempt income, the question of disallowance of expenditure incurred in relation to such exempt income does not arise.

        3. Re-computation of Book Profit under Section 115JB:

        The final issue was the re-computation of book profit under Section 115JB in respect of disallowance of expenditure incurred in relation to exempt income under Section 14A. The AO made adjustments to the book profit by adding the disallowed expenditure under Section 14A.

        The CIT(A) deleted the adjustments, relying on the decision of the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in CIT vs Bengal Finance and Investments Pvt. Ltd., which held that the amount disallowed under Section 14A cannot be added to arrive at the book profit for the purpose of Section 115JB. The CIT(A) also referred to the ITAT Special Bench decision in ACIT vs Vireet Investment Pvt. Ltd., which stated that computation under clause (f) of Explanation (1) to Section 115JB(2) should be made without resorting to the computation under Section 14A read with Rule 8D.

        The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)’s findings, concluding that the adjustments made by the AO to the book profit under Section 115JB were not warranted.

        Conclusion:

        The Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by the revenue, upholding the CIT(A)’s decisions on all issues. The Tribunal confirmed that:
        1. The assessee was entitled to the additional deduction claimed under Section 80IA in the revised return.
        2. No disallowance under Section 14A could be made in the absence of exempt income.
        3. Adjustments to book profit under Section 115JB in respect of disallowance under Section 14A were not justified.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found