TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Assessee's Appeals Dismissed for Non-Appearance and Lack of Prosecution</h1> <h3>Smt. Chandrika Tapuriah Versus Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle-2, Mumbai</h3> The ITAT Mumbai dismissed all appeals of the assessee for assessment years 2001-02 to 2007-08 due to non-appearance and lack of prosecution. Despite ... - Issues involved: Non-appearance of the assessee in appeals before the ITAT Mumbai, dismissal of appeals for non-prosecution.Summary:Issue 1: Non-appearance of the assessee in appeals before ITAT MumbaiThe appeals were filed by the assessee against the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals)-XXXVI, Mumbai, for assessment years 2001-02 to 2007-08. Despite multiple notices and no appearance by the assessee or their representative, it was concluded that the assessee was not interested in prosecuting the appeals.Issue 2: Dismissal of appeals for non-prosecutionReferring to a judgment by the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court and a decision by the Delhi Bench of the Tribunal, it was held that when a party does not wish to prosecute proceedings, the court or tribunal has the inherent power to dismiss the appeal. Following these precedents, the ITAT Mumbai treated the appeals as unadmitted and consequently dismissed them.In conclusion, all the appeals of the assessee were dismissed by the ITAT Mumbai due to non-appearance and lack of prosecution.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
