Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Spinetoram is classifiable under Chapter 38 and qualifies as a bio-pesticide based on Saccharopolyspora spinosa so as to be eligible for exemption under Entry No. 249 of Notification No. 50/2017-Cus. dated 30-6-2017.
Analysis: The product literature, departmental comments, and other materials showed that Spinetoram is derived from fermentation of Saccharopolyspora spinosa and then chemically modified. The product was treated as an insecticide falling under Chapter 38, and insecticide was regarded as a subset of pesticide. The fact that the manufacturing process involved chemical or synthetic modification did not, by itself, negate its character as a bio-pesticide, particularly in light of the registration granted under the Insecticides Act, 1968. The materials before the Authority supported the view that the product remained based on Saccharopolyspora spinosa and satisfied the conditions of the exemption entry.
Conclusion: Spinetoram was held to be eligible for the benefit of Entry No. 249 of Notification No. 50/2017-Cus. dated 30-6-2017.
Ratio Decidendi: A product derived from Saccharopolyspora spinosa does not cease to be a bio-pesticide merely because it undergoes chemical or synthetic modification, if the evidence shows it remains based on that organism and satisfies the exemption entry conditions.