Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the prosecution could invoke the court's power to summon the then Collector as a witness under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to test the respondent's plea of alibi, and whether such summoning would amount to filling a lacuna in the prosecution case.
Analysis: Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 confers a wide power on the court and, where the evidence of a person appears essential to the just decision of the case, imposes a duty to summon or recall that evidence. The controlling consideration is the discovery of truth and a just decision, not the stage of trial alone. The respondent had himself raised the plea of alibi at an early stage and had led defence evidence on that issue. In such a situation, the Collector was the most material witness on the question whether the respondent was present in his chamber at the relevant time. An application to examine such a witness, moved to enable the court to reach the truth on a contested issue, cannot be characterised as an impermissible attempt to fill a lacuna merely because it is made late in the trial.
Conclusion: The High Court erred in setting aside the Sessions Judge's order. The application to summon the Collector was maintainable and its allowance was justified; the order restoring that application stands sustained.