TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>CESTAT dismisses appeal for non-compliance with pre-deposit; parties must meet requirements</h1> <h3>Ajit Singh Versus CC, Delhi</h3> The appeal was dismissed by the CESTAT NEW DELHI as the appellant failed to appear and comply with the mandatory pre-deposit requirement. - Ajit Singh ... Maintainability of appeal - mandatory requirement of pre-deposit has not been complied with - HELD THAT:- The Post Office report indicates that the communication dated 08 January, 2019 sent by Speed Post on 10 January, 2019 was actually served on the appellant on 18 January, 2019. The Office had also sent a communication dated 30 January, 2019 to the appellant by speed post informing the appellant that the hearing has been fixed for 23 January, 2019. This letter has also been served upon the appellant on 07 February, 2019. Today, neither the Appellant nor his counsel has appeared. It therefore, transpires that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the appeal as even the mandatory requirement of pre-deposit has not been complied with - appeal dismissed. The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI as the appellant did not appear and failed to comply with the mandatory requirement of pre-deposit.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
