Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Court Addresses Multiple Applications in Comprehensive Judgment</h1> Various applications related to impleadment, directions, conditional approvals, disqualification, and support for the resolution were addressed in the ... Seeking a take over by the Resolution Professional/R-2 over the control and management of the affairs of Corporate Debtor from the 3rd respondent - HELD THAT:- The prayer was made because the appeal was pending and if the matter has been taken up for final hearing, that issue in an appropriate manner can be dealt with in the appeal itself - Application disposed off. Scope of the scrutiny in the present proceedings - impleadment of Bank of Maharashtra - HELD THAT:- The caveat to this expressed by learned counsels for respondents Nos. 1 and 3 is that it would open a pandora’s box and in any case the benchmark of consent of the creditors today is of not 75% but 66% in terms of Section 30, sub- Section (iv) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - learned counsels for respondents Nos. 1 and 3 sought to contend that no creditor de hors the consortium could have invoked the bank guarantee and this is not in the nature of guarantee invoked which is to operate as a bar in terms of Section 29A(h) of IBC. It is also their say that RBL bank was not a part of the consortium and had actually given up their security. On impleadment of the Bank of Maharashtra as respondent No. 11, it is issued notice to the said respondent returnable on 07.11.2021 - List as part-heard for directions in miscellaneous matters on 09.11.2021. Issues:1. Application for permission to file additional documents, exemption from filing affidavit(s), and application under order LV.2. Application for early hearing of appeal/directions.3. Application for impleadment.4. Application for directions filed by the State Bank of India.5. Scrutiny of conditional approval granted by Bank of Maharashtra.6. Impleadment of Bank of Maharashtra as respondent No. 11.7. Disqualification of respondent No. 3.8. Support for the resolution by respondent No. 10/Punjab National Bank.1. Application for permission to file additional documents, exemption from filing affidavit(s), and application under order LV:The applications for permission to file additional documents, exemption from filing affidavit(s), and application under order LV are allowed.2. Application for early hearing of appeal/directions:The applications for early hearing of appeal/directions are disposed of as the appeal is taken up for hearing.3. Application for impleadment:An application for impleadment has been filed by the operational creditor, M/s Pradeep Colonisers & Suppliers Pvt. Ltd., which is allowed as the appellant has no objection to the impleadment.4. Application for directions filed by the State Bank of India:The State Bank of India filed an application seeking a takeover by the Resolution Professional over the control and management of the affairs of the Corporate Debtor from the 3rd respondent. The application also requested a forensic audit, which was addressed as the matter was taken up for final hearing.5. Scrutiny of conditional approval granted by Bank of Maharashtra:During the hearing, it was noted that Bank of Maharashtra had granted conditional approval, raising questions about the approval benchmark. It was suggested to implead Bank of Maharashtra as respondent No. 11 to obtain their view on the matter.6. Impleadment of Bank of Maharashtra as respondent No. 11:In light of the discussions, Bank of Maharashtra was impleaded as respondent No. 11, with a notice issued to them returnable on a specified date.7. Disqualification of respondent No. 3:There were discussions regarding the disqualification of respondent No. 3, with arguments presented by both sides regarding the invocation of guarantees and demands made by creditors.8. Support for the resolution by respondent No. 10/Punjab National Bank:Respondent No. 10/Punjab National Bank expressed support for the resolution.In conclusion, the judgment addressed various applications and issues related to impleadment, directions, conditional approvals, disqualification, and support for the resolution. The Court allowed certain applications, disposed of others, and issued notices for further proceedings, ensuring a comprehensive examination of the legal aspects involved in the case.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found