Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the defendant was entitled to extension of time to file the written statement in a commercial suit beyond the statutory period under Order VIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 as amended by the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, and whether the Supreme Court's orders extending limitation during the pandemic applied to that additional period.
Analysis: The amended proviso to Order VIII Rule 1 provides an initial period of 30 days to file the written statement, with a further period that may be allowed for recorded reasons and costs, but only up to 120 days from service of summons in commercial disputes. The outer limit is therefore mandatory and the further period is not part of the prescribed limitation period. The Supreme Court's order extending limitation during the pandemic, read with the later clarification, extended only the period of limitation and not the period during which a court may condone delay or enlarge time in its discretion. On the facts, the application for extension was moved after the initial 30 days and sought time beyond the statutory window.
Conclusion: The application for extension of time was not maintainable and was rejected.